A colleague is in a pool of two people for one role. Whoever does not get the role will be made redundant. She has been told today that because the other person is currently on maternity leave, they automatically get the job. This means that my colleague has been placed in another pool for a similar role, which she does not have the correct experience for - namely, she will be made redundant. the company have said that positive discrimination in this case is allowable because of the maternity leave rights.
Now, I don't agree with this. I thought that selection criteria should be applied to both colleagues in the same way. Though of course there is the added complication of someone returning from mat leave having to be offered a suitable alternative role (reg. 10 I think). It's a bit confusing and seems unfair. What thinks Hitched?
ETA - it turns out that the person on mat leave is actually only on mat leave until this Thursday, after which she is taking holiday as the pay is beetter. This means that officially, when the selection date and end of consultation comes up she is no longer on mat leave. Would that make a difference?