Last night, we played a netball match. There were two incidents that I ma being teased mercilessly about, one deserved and one not (in my cabbage).
1. I took out a girl with cerebral palsy. She was tiny and her cheekbone was directly in line with my shoulder as I turned to run. She went all wobbly and had to sit down abruptly, then she went off injured. This was clearly an accident but I am now being compared to the Inbetweeners, where Will hits a wheelchair-bound girl with a Frisbee.
Also, my shoulder wrecks.
2. For each team, a Player Of The Match is nominated by the opposing team. We voted for their Goalkeeper, who had already gone home. It was my job to convey this information to the umpire, who duly went to find out the GK's name from her team mates. The umpire returned to ask which GK I meant, as there had been two girls playing in that position (I hadn't realised). Usually, you then describe the person - hair colour, general height, etc. The GK we meant was a very tall, very fat black girl, so I promptly replied "The tall, black girl". The umpire told me that she knew who I meant but "couldn't use that description to ask for her name". Instead - INSTEAD - she went back to the team and asked (I was listening) for the name of the "GK who was, you know, the big girl". REALLY? That's better?
I am enduring teasing about latent racist tendencies (all jokingly, I add).
Is it wrong to use skin colour as a clear distinguishing feature between two people? I don't use it unnecessarily but is it any different describing someone as the "short" girl or the "blonde" girl?