This might just be a silly question, but I need to sound out some thoughts on this.
I'm pretty sure that that traditional way to cater for a full-day wedding is to have the wedding breakfast at some point in the afternoon, and then to have an evening buffet or have some kind of food served. As neither side of the family are originally from the UK and both myself and the HTB are the first in the families to get married, we've both got some figuring out to do!
Anyway, I was chatting the other day, and apparently in his side of the family, the weddings they have been to serve the wedding breakfast and that's it. Even though it's a full day. I was asked if we are still considering doing the two meals, and my response was basically, 'Do we have a choice? We have to look after our guests.' I wouldn't want anyone to go hungry! I've been to a wedding where there was only one meal - the wedding breakfast - which was served at about 4 or 5pm. I recall that many guests were hungry before and after and I don't really want our guests to be in the same position. But while we were chatting to a member of his family, she was really surprised that there would be food served in the evening too.
The food is a costly part of the wedding and I just wondered what others think about this? I never really considered not having food during both the day and evening until this conversation. Thoughts?