I've just been having a rather heated debate with H2B about money, we are finally going to get a joint account and were discussing how much needs to go in it each month. I am a freelancer and as such have a sporadic income - if I don't do any work then I don't earn any money. He has recently started a new job in sales and is doing very well, he has a good basic salary which is higher than in his previous job, and an excellent commission structure. His basic salary is just under twice what I earn in an average year, and if you include OTE it's way over three times my salary.
We have been together for approaching five years, we moved in together after three months and have always split everything 50/50. This was the fairest way to do things in the beginning, but I now feel that it would be fairer to each pay proportionately to what we earn. He does not think this is at all fair, doesn't see why he should pay extra for me. I tried to explain that while we pay 50/50 for everything, we're limited to doing things that I can afford, leaving me with nothing at the end of the month while he still has plenty left over, but if we split the contributions on a different ratio we would be able to jointly afford more/better things.
He said he had taken steps to increase his income by getting a better paying job, and now it's my turn to earn more money. I said I've increased my rates and taken on higher-paying clients, so I'm making progress in earning more, but I can only earn as much as I can actually work.
Am I wrong for wanting to split the contributions this way? I can understand his point of view, he doesn't want to support me, but I'm not planning to give up work and let him pay for everything. I just want to make it fairer, and paying proportionately seems fairer to me. Am I foolish for assuming that marriage means sharing our incomes, even if they are vastly different?!
How do you share the financial contributions in your household? And are there any arguments I can use to convince H2B that my idea is a good one?