So, I just read this daily fail article. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2350034/Twitter-users-named-Jeremy-Forrests-victim-conviction-broken-law.html
I understand that if someones identity has been protected it's illegal to name them but what I don't understand is why her identity has been protected. At the time she went missing/they went off together she was fully named and pictured so it seems a bit late to try and protect?? Also she has not even painted herself as a victim, she's quite openly saying to people that she's going to visit him in prison and they intend to marry.
Who decides about protecting identity? Is it likely to be something she's requiested or something that's been decided for her?