What do you think? Are the BBC right to not show it?
I'm sort of torn, and very definitely fence sitting. I can see their point, and I get why they aren't showing it, but I'm not sure it's the right decision. I haven't seen the appeal, so I have no idea how political it is, and also have no idea how often the other networks are showing it.
Is there really a difference between people being homeless with no food/clean water/shelter due to a cyclone/tsunami or due to someone else's actions. the victims are still victims regardless of how they became victims surely? And does helping them mean you are siding with or against either side? I'm not so sure.
Which other DEC appeals have the BBC broadcast? DEC doesn't only do appeals for people hit by floods/droughts etc, there have been plenty of appeals for people suffering due to civil war, or political instability.
The BBC are still managing to give it rather a lot of coverage, and I'm wondering if that is partly on purpose, sort of saying "we can't broadcast the appeal, but we are going to make sure everyone knows about it anyway".