Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

haagweg
Beginner September 2008

Are you middle class?

haagweg, 28 May, 2008 at 14:54

Posted on Off Topic Posts 48

Or how do you define being middle class? I had a conversation with someone who felt that if a person's parents are working class then the off spring can't be middleclass, for at least another generation or two - so maybe their children or grandchildren can be if they continue down the middle class...

Or how do you define being middle class? I had a conversation with someone who felt that if a person's parents are working class then the off spring can't be middleclass, for at least another generation or two - so maybe their children or grandchildren can be if they continue down the middle class route. Whereas I think of it as maybe working class roots but middle class if the person themself was in a white collar career/ owned their house in a nice area/ highly educated/ had money, etc. Which would you agree with broadly?

So education and income make up my main criteria I suppose and they tend to go with certain job types. This is despite the fact that I know that some people may earn more and have nicer houses/cars/holidays even though their education and job type doesn't fit my criteria e.g. a builder, plumber etc. I suppose middle class can mean different things to different people (I'm not talking about the upper middle here who I think of as wealthy beyond the average e.g. millionnaires? but I'm not sure I know what the lower middle are. And who the middle middle are?). Some say that if you work for a living then you are working class (what about people on benefits then lol) or they say depends on your roots like my friend who believes in the connection to be working class and proud of it. Middle class might be seen as snobby a la Hyacinth Bucket or just comfortable professional and something that people can attain through their own merit as well as being born into. Both could be seen in a positive or negative light depending on how you look at it, hmm, minefield.

I'm interested though to see if the majority would agree with me in the first paragraph about the generational thing.

48 replies

  • LittleStar
    Beginner March 2009
    LittleStar ·
    • Report
    • Hide content
    View quoted message

    I think this is how OH sees our situation, and he thinks we're more middle class than working class. I can see what he means when it's explained like this.

    • Reply
  • LouM
    Beginner August 2007
    LouM ·
    • Report
    • Hide content
    View quoted message

    Absolutely agree, but given the 'pyramid' shape of the class system, you could find that you are perceived by the vast majority of the population to have climbed a class, whilst it not registering at all on the radar on the smaller group of upper/ upper-middle class people who operate by a different set of objective criteria (and on a tangent, I find 'upper middle' far more of a quagmire than 'middle').

    • Reply
  • NickJ
    Beginner
    NickJ ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    Hmm, i d like to answer this, but my blue collar is itching my neck ?

    • Reply
  • Katchoo
    Katchoo ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    I find this whole topic fascinating. My H's family are upper class in all aspects. He is related to the Queen; he was privately educated at an excellent school; they 'summer' abroad; they have servants (proper live-in servants) and certainly have that 'air' about them. Of course, they are all rich too. My family, however, are definitely middle class.

    I think it is down to attitude. H doesn't have the money that his parents and grandparents have, but he still retains the 'genteelness' I suppose (for want of a better word). I guess he's just quite posh really, which is a constant source of amusement to me?.

    The differences between H and I are quite marked from the way we speak, our terms of reference for things and our experiences of life. However, I do feel myself being dragged slowly up the class scale now as, by dint of our marriage, I am moving in very different social circles, and my outlook and experiences have very much altered as a result.

    Another thought occurred to me while typing, in that I suppose I am treated differently now by other people, for being Mr K's wife. Maybe how people perceive you has something to do with it as well? I don't know.

    • Reply
  • JK
    Beginner February 2007
    JK ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    Hmm, not sure. My paternal grandparents were proper working class - she worked in factories and as a cook, he worked as an ambulance driver, and then a lorry driver. They were actually relatively well-off. My grandfather was a grafter, and a tight git, making for lots of savings and their own home. My maternal grandmother was divorced from her first husband, and then widowed by her second, and was skint. I bet she'd have said she was lower-middle class: she'd been an officer's wife in India, and had servants, before they came back to England. She was always a bit 'distressed gentlefolk'. By which I mean barking, obviously.

    My parents? My Dad was in management till the 1980s when it all went belly-up, he was made redundant three times, and ended up working in John Lewis in security till he retired. Mum left school with no qualifications, but got herself a fistful later, and ended up as an HEO in the civil service. I think they'd call themselves working class too, though.

    I'd don't really ally myself anywhere. I 'think' working class, a lot of the time. I suppose I don't really care what people think of me, which might exclude me from middle-classdom anyway. Mr JK and I were talking about this the other day, specifically about the defining of those not-working-and-never-planning-to as the 'Underclass' rather than the working class. My father nearly died of shame when he had to sign on for a fortnight when I was a child. In the working class I know there's no glamour in handouts.

    • Reply
  • Rache
    Beginner January 2004
    Rache ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    I think your husband wins in the poshness stakes Katchoo? I think of
    MrRache as posh, but he's a rung down from that - upper middle definitely - major public school, third or fourth generation oxbridge, family all professionals, inherited home.

    Me - lower middle I think. I was the first in mum's family to go to uni (mum's family are underclass/notworking class), but the second in dad's - and he is a professional who got into uni to study architecture from his farming/servant background on a student grant in the 60s.

    • Reply
  • Rache
    Beginner January 2004
    Rache ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    The reason I know I'm lower middle is because I say "pleased to meet you" rather than "how d'you do" like MrRache?

    Oh the British class system; it's a hoot.

    • Reply
  • legless
    Beginner
    legless ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    No idea! and not really that bothered. my parents are working class, i believe Dr L's being teachers may be middle class traditionally? Our lifestyle is very different to our parents' but i don't understand why that would make us a different class to them...

    I think that unless you stick to the traditional indicators there are too many variables in society nowadays to define anyone accurately, and i think the traditional 'classes' aren't relevant to today really.

    i think Zebra is 'aristocracy' - am i right?

    • Reply
  • NumbNuts
    Beginner October 2004
    NumbNuts ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    No, only lions can be aristocracy tsk!

    • Reply
  • Old Nick Esq.
    Old Nick Esq. ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    I'm deffo (hard) drinking class.

    • Reply
  • Moomoo
    Beginner July 2008
    Moomoo ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    The way I've always understood it is

    Upper class - actually related to royalty, or perhaps some 'private' (as in no need to work) families whose daughters would traditionally have been presented to the queen for 'coming out'

    Upper middle - not quite in that circle but nearly, probably very well off in terms of inherited wealth, best schools and connections. Diplomats and absolute top level civil service/forces/church

    Middle middle - top level professionals, heads of business, doctors, lawyers, high ranking academics etc.

    Lower middle - teachers, not-quite-traditional-professions but with degree, emphasis on schooling, education, good behaviour etc

    Upper working - less educated but highly skilled roles, strong emphasis on respectability and being seen to do the right thing, often entrepreneurs and successful self-employed

    Rest of working - less bothered about being respectable but with own standards and expectations

    Subclass (sorry, sounds awful) - no shame, often no jobs for generations, not much awareness of world existing above their group.

    i'm not saying i'm correct, but that was how i understood it - probably mostly cobbled together from reading jane austen at a formative age and various inherited prejudices... by this grading i'd say my parents are lower middle (bank manager, teacher), their parents are upper working (successful tradesmen, apprenticed and successful businesses), i'm lower middle, and my husband is middle middle. I went to private day school, he went to a good boarder, his parents are both oxford academics, his dad's a professor. but i've married up so perhaps i'm middle middle ? A friend of mine is getting married to a diplomat's son this summer, i think they are upper middle.

    • Reply
  • Ms. Scarlett
    Beginner April 2007
    Ms. Scarlett ·
    • Report
    • Hide content

    Moomoo, that list accords almost perfectly with the ideas of different classes I have in my head (apart from the fact that I would definitely call teaching a middle-class, traditional profession).

    I think, for many of us, considering our grandparents' background will lead to confusion re. class. My grandparents had very traditional working-class jobs (my grandpa was a travelling salesman, etc.) but at the time of my parents' generation (born in the 50s) there was a great expansion in university education and a corresponding increase in the middle class (then of course there was the big expansion again in university education at the beginning of the 90s). This is coupled with a general move in the last 30 years or so away from manufacturing industry to the sort of semi-skilled job where you don't get your hands dirty, again confusing the issue - are those with non-degree-requiring admin jobs middle-class because they might wear smart clothes to work and sit in a comfortable office? Perhaps. Certainly many more of us can claim to be middle-class than 40 or 50 years ago.

    Equally, there's quite a big gap in social expectations, pastimes and mannerisms etc. between the lower and upper middle classes. H's family are what I would call upper middle class (diplomats and military top brass), whereas my family are more lower-middle, possibly middle-middle, and there are certainly lots of things that are different (I remember my MIL quite innocently asking if I had been to a "day school" ?). "Middle-class" is such a wide category as to be pretty meaningless.

    And yes, it is all a load of balls!

    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×

General groups

Hitched article topics