I read a really interesting article yesterday, regarding celebrity bullying over Twitter. Now, it wasn't about people bullying celebrities, it was about celebrities encouraging their followers to bully others.
Article here
Specific examples:
Ricky Gervais encouraged his fans to go on a "div hunt" and when a suitable victim was brought to his attention, he launched into a bit of a tirade. Obviously, his fans followed suit, to the point where the person deleted their account.
Simon Pegg responded to this tweet: “For some reason @simonpegg really really annoys me, hot fuzz is good though! He’s on my list, and it ain’t a good list! #annoying.” by encouraging his fans to flame "the d*ck-twitch" - they duly obliged. In fairness, Pegg apologised for this.
Noel Fielding, after being chastised by a girl for using the word "retarded" in his feed, called the tweeter a "dumb f*ck" and "big nose", retweeted his fans as they delivered insults and threats of violence to her, then thanked them all for their support, saying he'd had a brilliant laugh. One of his fans published her address, she received death threats. The girl tried to commit suicide. Fielding said sorry but qualified that if people were going to be mean over the internet (because calling someone out for using the word "retarded" is mean, apparently), they deserved everything they got.
And as a better example, apparently Charlie Brooker edits names from his tweets when responding to insults, specifically to stop his followers jumping on the bandwagon.
.....................................
I'm on two minds on this. Is it reasonable for celebrities to respond to negativity like this? Maybe Fielding is right - if you can't take it, don't dish it out. But then, maybe people with hundreds of thousands of slavish followers should realise that they have to act a little more responsibly, rather than ordering their minions to attack someone?
Thoughts?