Three weeks ago my husband was sacked for gross misconduct. It was a total fiasco and we've been talking to ACAs about unfair dismissal. He was sacked because he did private work for a former employee on a day off. He did this becuase they had cut his hours significantly and we needed the money. Three other members of staff have done work for this person, including his manager.
He was told when he was sacked that they were going to have to let someone go anyways (redundancy) but that he had given tthem a convenient excuse for it to be him. Nice.
He has picked up more private work from this guy and it could be a great future, BUT becuase it's a new business there could be periods of time when there is no work and that would be difficult for us. Becuase of that my H is considering going back becuase the pay is good and there isn't much else out there at the momoent.
So yesterday he gets a call from his manager saying the owner had asked him to call and offer his job back becuase they had a lot more work on and needed someone. ? They made two people redundant the week before they saked my H. I know my H worked so very hard for them and was one of the hardest workers often putting in 60/70 hour weeks for them and the other two made redundant were dead wood, but surely they have to offer work back to people made redundant????
Also his offence couldn't have been that serious if they're willing to hire him back three weeks later? Does that make the sacking for gross misconduct unfair? I'm still trying to get through to ACAS but dont seem to be having much luck so interested in people thoughts here?