Menu selections on wedding website

Hey! This is definitely possible as I had multiple options for each course. I added an event for each course. So for people I was inviting all day I invited them to 'ceremony', then added events called 'choose your starter' 'choose your main' and 'choose your dessert'.


Go into 'choose your starter' and click on settings. Select track menu. Then you can add your menu choices for starter. Then repeat for main and dessert. There is only enough space for you to add a few words. So just do something like 'scallops'...
Then on the wedding website on the rsvp page I added instructions on how to do it and added the full menu breakdown. Eg Pan fried scallops with XYZ'. Gor those with dietary stuff I just asked them to tell us when they rsvp as there is a comment section. You can add this to the download later.
It worked really well. For any oldies or people not great with tech we just called them and asked for their choices and added it ourselves. Then at the end you just download the spreadsheet with all the choices for the caterer.
Hope this helps!

When setting up menu choices on a wedding website, it can be tricky if the RSVP only allows one selection instead of separate courses. A good workaround is to customize your RSVP form or use multiple questions so guests can pick a starter, main, and dessert individually. This ensures accurate pre-orders and a smoother planning process. For more helpful tips and tools, explore the Super Bear Adventure MOD APK .

@ fnaf online You’re definitely not the first person to run into this — most wedding website builders only let guests pick one item per RSVP question unless you change how the menu is set up. The good news is that there is a way to make Starter, Main, and Dessert selectable separately.

You might need to adjust your RSVP settings or use custom questions so guests can select multiple courses separately. I had a similar issue while planning logistics (even while researching cat relocation services canada ), and splitting each course into its own question worked smoothly.