Hi everyone, so myself and my partner have been trying to arrange a reasonable date for our wedding and look at suitable venues, we definetly want to get married in our village church and have definetly ruled out a ceremony at the venue. We are in Basingstoke, hampshire. We have looked around at alot of venues around our area and either they are way above our price range orsomething about the venue doesnt quiete sit right for us be it either the layout or the honeymoon suite or the scenary etc... the list goes on.
Anyway the one place myself and my gorgeous bride to be have agreed on is perfect is in the new forest and the venue from the church in our village is 55mins (going by google maps) does this sound like its too far to expect guests to travel?
All of our guests drive that would be coming so not an issue, we have around 10 guests that would be coming from the midlands or hertfordshire, 1 small family of 4 coming from south wales but the rest are either from Basingstoke or Southampton, i would have thought guests from basingstoke wouldnt mind too much its just the guests from further north i'm unsure if they'll be happy travelling to basingstoke 1st then on to the new forest another potential 55mins to 1hr20mins depending on traffic on m3. I also don't know if guests from Southampton would be happy travelling 30-40mins up to the church to then travel approx 1hr back down and past their homes and out to new forest but they are then closer to home meaning if they wanted they could just travel home from the venue rather than fork out for hotel rooms?
my partner is in the mindset of if they want to come they will go if they don't then so be it.
we were thinking of telling guests that its up to them if they want to attend both the church and reception or if its too much for them to go straight onto the reception